customer: be at work

Related concepts

Parents	computer user Weight: 0.65 , fan Weight: 0.64 , constituent Weight: 0.63 , business Weight: 0.61
Siblings	employer Weight: 0.63 , intel Weight: 0.60 , asset Weight: 0.59 , operator Weight: 0.59 , citizen Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at work	1.00
be used to work	0.96
require employee to work	0.78
tell employee to work on saturday	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(customer, be at work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(computer user, be used to work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employer, require employee to work)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(employer, tell employee to work on saturday)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(customer, be at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(employer, tell employee to work on saturday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(employer, tell employee to work on saturday)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employer, require employee to work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(employer, require employee to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(customer, be at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(customer, be at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(employer, require employee to work)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(employer, tell employee to work on saturday)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(customer, be at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work)