computer user: be used to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents user
Weight: 0.67
, information
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.50
, everyone
Weight: 0.50
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.81
, customer
Weight: 0.65
, computer database
Weight: 0.35
, computer file
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to work 1.00
be at work 0.96
requires know how computer work 0.81
involve work with other person 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(program, requires know how computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(program, requires know how computer work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(program, requires know how computer work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(program, requires know how computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(computer user, be used to work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(computer user, be used to work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(customer, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(customer, be at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(computer user, be used to work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(computer user, be used to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(program, requires know how computer work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(program, involve work with other person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(customer, be at work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(program, requires know how computer work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(computer user, be used to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(program, involve work with other person)