program: involve work with other person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television program
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.67
, package
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings camp
Weight: 0.66
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, campaign
Weight: 0.65
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.65
, philosophy
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
involve work with other person 1.00
be do by person 0.81
requires know how computer work 0.76
requires either buy or build computer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(camp, be do by person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(camp, be do by person)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(camp, be do by person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(program, involve work with other person)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(program, requires know how computer work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(program, requires either buy or build computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(program, requires know how computer work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(program, requires either buy or build computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(program, requires either buy or build computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, requires either buy or build computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(program, requires know how computer work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(program, requires know how computer work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(program, involve work with other person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(program, involve work with other person)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(camp, be do by person)