cutting: be down help forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be down help forests 1.00
be rainforest for roads bad for plants 0.85
be rainforest for roads bad 0.84
be rainforest for roads 0.83
affect forest fires 0.82
be rainforest 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cutting, be down help forests)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cutting, be rainforest for roads)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cutting, affect forest fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cutting, be rainforest for roads)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cutting, be rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cutting, affect forest fires)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cutting, be rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cutting, be rainforest for roads)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cutting, be rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cutting, affect forest fires)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be rainforest for roads)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect forest fires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cutting, be down help forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cutting, be down help forests)