cutting: lead to global warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
lead to global warming 1.00
lead to warming 0.94
cause global warming 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cutting, lead to global warming)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to warming)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cutting, lead to warming)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cutting, cause global warming)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cutting, cause global warming)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cutting, lead to warming)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cutting, cause global warming)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cutting, cause global warming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cutting, lead to warming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cutting, lead to global warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cutting, lead to global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to global warming)