cutting: lead to warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
lead to warming 1.00
lead to global warming 0.94
cause global warming 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cutting, lead to warming)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cutting, lead to global warming)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to global warming)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cutting, lead to global warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cutting, cause global warming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cutting, cause global warming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cutting, lead to global warming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cutting, cause global warming)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cutting, cause global warming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cutting, lead to warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cutting, lead to warming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cutting, lead to warming)