cycling: is better driving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better driving 1.00
is driving 0.94
is better running 0.77
is better walking 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cycling, is better driving)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cycling, is driving)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cycling, is driving)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is driving)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cycling, is better walking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cycling, is better walking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better walking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cycling, is better running)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better running)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cycling, is better running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cycling, is better walking)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cycling, is driving)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cycling, is better running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better driving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(cycling, is better driving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cycling, is better driving)