cyclone: have female names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storm
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.54
, hazard
Weight: 0.54
, attraction
Weight: 0.54
, flood
Weight: 0.49
Siblings hurricane
Weight: 0.67
, typhoon
Weight: 0.38
, tornado
Weight: 0.36
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.33
, twister
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have female names 1.00
have women 's names 0.91
have names 0.88
have different names 0.86
have human names 0.85
be given lady names 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cyclone, have female names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(storm, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have female names)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have female names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tornado, have names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have human names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cyclone, have female names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(typhoon, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have female names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hurricane, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have names)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(hurricane, have human names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have human names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hurricane, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have female names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(typhoon, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have names)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(typhoon, have different names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have different names)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tornado, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tornado, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cyclone, have female names)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cyclone, have women 's names)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have women 's names)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cyclone, have women 's names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cyclone, have women 's names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cyclone, have different names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have different names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cyclone, have names)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cyclone, have different names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cyclone, have different names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cyclone, have human names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have names)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cyclone, have names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cyclone, have names)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have human names)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cyclone, have human names)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cyclone, have human names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cyclone, have female names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(typhoon, have female names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, have female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tornado, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(typhoon, have different names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hurricane, have names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, have human names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(cyclone, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)