storm: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
get names 0.97
be called names 0.95
have different names 0.95
need names 0.95
has state names 0.94
be given names 0.92
have women 's names 0.90
be named names 0.90
have name 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tornado, have names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hurricane, have names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hurricane, get names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tornado, have names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tornado, have names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have different names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be given names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(storm, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(storm, get names)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, get names)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, need names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(storm, need names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(storm, be given names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, has state names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, has state names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storm, get names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(storm, be given names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(storm, need names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(storm, be given names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(storm, has state names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(storm, get names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(storm, has state names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(typhoon, be given names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(typhoon, have different names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tornado, have names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hurricane, have names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, get names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given names)