dab: be cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.43
, species
Weight: 0.40
, feature
Weight: 0.37
, substrate
Weight: 0.36
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.28
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.28
, microwave
Weight: 0.28
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap 1.00
is expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spray, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spray, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spray, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(dab, be cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dab, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dab, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(dab, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, be cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dab, be cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spray, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dab, be cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)