fiber optics: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive with companies 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lens, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lens, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)