camera lens: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.70
, camera
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, optics
Weight: 0.65
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.41
, digital camera
Weight: 0.39
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.36
, mirror
Weight: 0.35
, projector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be with f-stops expensive 0.96
be expensive at lenscrafters 0.95
be with f-stops more expensive 0.91
is costly 0.87
be with smaller f-stops expensive 0.87
be with smaller f-stops more expensive 0.85
be expensive with companies 0.84
is damn expensive 0.84
is cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camera, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lens, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lens, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mirror, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(projector, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mirror, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mirror, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(projector, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(projector, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(camera lens, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mirror, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(projector, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)