projector: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.71 , item Weight: 0.63 , electronic device Weight: 0.60 , feature Weight: 0.58
Siblings	laptop computer Weight: 0.37 , movie projector Weight: 0.37 , computer keyboard Weight: 0.36 , digital camera Weight: 0.36 , tablet computer Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
get expensive	0.94
get more expensive	0.90
be in market expensive	0.86
is cheaper	0.85
be much more costly today	0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today	0.84
be on cheaper	0.83
be more expensive than features	0.82
be sold cheaper	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(projector, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(projector, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)