digital camera: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camera, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(photograph, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(computer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(floppy disk, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(digital camera, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(floppy disk, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)