camera: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	digital camera Weight: 0.75 , electronic device Weight: 0.68 , recorder Weight: 0.64 , driver Weight: 0.61
Siblings	camera lens Weight: 0.70 , human eye Weight: 0.60 , underwater Weight: 0.54 , cctv Weight: 0.54 , flip Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is damn expensive	0.84
be cheaper on ebay	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(camera, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(camera, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(camera, be cheaper on ebay)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(camera, be cheaper on ebay)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(camera, be cheaper on ebay)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(camera, be cheaper on ebay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(camera, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)