photograph: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	artifact Weight: 0.67 , portrait Weight: 0.67 , painting Weight: 0.64 , image Weight: 0.61
Siblings	digital camera Weight: 0.73 , shot Weight: 0.59 , photo Weight: 0.38 , artwork Weight: 0.35 , sketch Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(painting, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(portrait, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(portrait, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(painting, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(portrait, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(painting, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(artwork, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(painting, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(photograph, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(portrait, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(photograph, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(shot, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(artwork, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(artwork, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(photograph, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(portrait, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(painting, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(artwork, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(shot, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(portrait, is expensive)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(painting, is expensive)