fiber optics: be expensive with companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.81
, technology
Weight: 0.73
, material
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.64
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.36
, lens
Weight: 0.35
, microwave
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive with companies 1.00
is expensive 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lens, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lens, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fiber optics, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fiber optics, be expensive with companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)