lens: be with smaller f-stops more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with smaller f-stops more expensive 1.00
be with smaller f-stops expensive 0.98
be with smaller f-stops 0.94
be with f-stops more expensive 0.94
be with f-stops expensive 0.89
be expensive at lenscrafters 0.85
is expensive 0.85
make object look larger 0.80
is costly 0.77
become thicker 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mirror, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mirror, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mirror, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mirror, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)