lens: be expensive at lenscrafters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive at lenscrafters 1.00
is expensive 0.95
be with f-stops expensive 0.94
be with f-stops more expensive 0.91
be with smaller f-stops expensive 0.87
be with smaller f-stops more expensive 0.85
is costly 0.83
be for glasses expensive 0.77
is expensive glasses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mirror, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mirror, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mirror, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lens, be with smaller f-stops more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lens, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lens, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lens, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mirror, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lens, be expensive at lenscrafters)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)