dallas: be better than houston

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, city
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, texas
Weight: 0.55
, soap opera
Weight: 0.55
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.36
, houston
Weight: 0.35
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, smallville
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than houston 1.00
be more popular than houston 0.96
be hotter than houston 0.93
be hotter than other parts of texas 0.81
be called dallas 0.81
be named dallas 0.80
be hotter than san antonio 0.79
be important to texas 0.78
compare to nyc 0.78
beat seattle at home 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(houston, be important to texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(houston, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(houston, be important to texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dallas, be better than houston)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dallas, be named dallas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dallas, be called dallas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dallas, beat seattle at home)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dallas, beat seattle at home)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dallas, beat seattle at home)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dallas, be named dallas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dallas, beat seattle at home)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dallas, be called dallas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be important to texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be called dallas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be named dallas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(dallas, be named dallas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dallas, be called dallas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dallas, be important to texas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(dallas, be important to texas)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dallas, be important to texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dallas, be better than houston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(houston, be important to texas)