dallas: be more popular than houston

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, city
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, texas
Weight: 0.55
, soap opera
Weight: 0.55
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.36
, houston
Weight: 0.35
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, smallville
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than houston 1.00
be better than houston 0.96
be hotter than houston 0.92
be hotter than other parts of texas 0.82
be called dallas 0.79
be important to texas 0.79
be named dallas 0.78
be hotter than san antonio 0.78
be more racist than new orleans 0.77
compare to nyc 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(houston, be important to texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(houston, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(houston, be important to texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dallas, be better than houston)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dallas, be named dallas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dallas, be called dallas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dallas, be better than houston)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than houston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dallas, be better than houston)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dallas, be named dallas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dallas, be called dallas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than san antonio)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dallas, be important to texas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(dallas, be named dallas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be better than houston)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dallas, be important to texas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dallas, be called dallas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be important to texas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(dallas, be important to texas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dallas, compare to nyc)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be hotter than other parts of texas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be called dallas)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be named dallas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dallas, be more popular than houston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be more popular than houston)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(houston, be important to texas)