dam: be bad for fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for fish 1.00
be bad for salmon 0.89
help in fishing 0.80
affect salmon habitat 0.80
keep saltwater out of rivers 0.77
is good for 0.76
be bad for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(creek, help in fishing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(creek, help in fishing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(creek, help in fishing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dam, be bad for fish)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for salmon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(dam, be bad for salmon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for salmon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dam, be bad for salmon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(dam, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(dam, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dam, is good for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(dam, is good for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dam, is good for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dam, is good for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(creek, help in fishing)