dam: be bad for salmon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for salmon 1.00
affect salmon habitat 0.91
be bad for fish 0.89
help in fishing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(creek, help in fishing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(creek, help in fishing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(creek, help in fishing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(dam, be bad for salmon)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dam, be bad for fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dam, be bad for fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for salmon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dam, be bad for salmon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dam, be bad for salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(creek, help in fishing)