dan: be in new roseanne

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.58
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.33
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new roseanne 1.00
be in roseanne 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dan, be in new roseanne)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(dan, be in roseanne)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dan, be in roseanne)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(dan, be in roseanne)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in roseanne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in new roseanne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(dan, be in new roseanne)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dan, be in new roseanne)