dan: be in roseanne

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.58
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.33
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in roseanne 1.00
be fogleberg 0.88
be in new roseanne 0.78
be on back tsn 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(dan, be in roseanne)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dan, be fogleberg)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(dan, be fogleberg)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dan, be fogleberg)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dan, be fogleberg)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dan, be on back tsn)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in new roseanne)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dan, be on back tsn)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dan, be in new roseanne)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(dan, be on back tsn)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dan, be in new roseanne)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dan, be on back tsn)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dan, be in new roseanne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in roseanne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(dan, be in roseanne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(dan, be in roseanne)