data: be valuable to scientists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, form
Weight: 0.47
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, statistics
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32
, database
Weight: 0.32
, mapping
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable to scientists 1.00
be important to science 0.77
be important in science 0.77
be useful to researcher 0.75
be used in scientific method 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(statistics, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(data, be valuable to scientists)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(data, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(data, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(data, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(data, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(data, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(data, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(data, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(data, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(data, be valuable to scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in science)