data: be important in science

Property	Similarity
be important in science	1.00
be important to science	1.00
be science	0.95
science	0.94
have important in computer science structures	0.86
be important to scientific endeavor	0.81
be valuable to scientists	0.77
be used in scientific method	0.76

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(data, be science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(data, be important to science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(data, science)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(data, be important to science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(data, be science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(data, have important in computer science structures)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(data, science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(data, be important to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(data, be important to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(data, have important in computer science structures)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(data, be science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(data, be important to scientific endeavor)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(data, be important to scientific endeavor)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(data, science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(data, be important to scientific endeavor)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(data, be valuable to scientists)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(data, be science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(data, be important to scientific endeavor)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(data, be valuable to scientists)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(data, science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(data, be valuable to scientists)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(data, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(data, be valuable to scientists)

Parents	resource Weight: 0.53 , service Weight: 0.52 , tool Weight: 0.50 , thing Weight: 0.47 , form Weight: 0.47
Siblings	internet service provider Weight: 0.32 , statistics Weight: 0.32 , information Weight: 0.32 , database Weight: 0.32 , mapping Weight: 0.31

data: be important in science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings