data: have important in computer science structures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, form
Weight: 0.47
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, statistics
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32
, database
Weight: 0.32
, mapping
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important in computer science structures 1.00
be important in science 0.86
be important to science 0.86
be science 0.84
science 0.83
be used in scientific method 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(statistics, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(data, have important in computer science structures)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(data, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(data, science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(data, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(data, be important to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(data, be important to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(data, be important in science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(data, be important to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(data, be important in science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(data, be science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(data, be important in science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(data, be important to science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(data, be science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(data, science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(data, science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(data, be science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(data, science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(data, have important in computer science structures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(data, have important in computer science structures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in science)