date: go by last period

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings list
Weight: 0.60
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, beginning
Weight: 0.59
, may
Weight: 0.58
, december
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
go by last period 1.00
go by period 0.96
be last month of year 0.81
be on days year 0.76
be in samarra 0.75
be on different days year 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(december, be last month of year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(december, be last month of year)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(december, be last month of year)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(date, go by last period)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(date, be on different days year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(date, be on different days year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(date, be on different days year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(date, be on different days year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(date, go by last period)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(december, be last month of year)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)