dave: be at you

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, legend
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.57
, people
Weight: 0.57
, star
Weight: 0.54
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.36
, gordon
Weight: 0.35
, jim
Weight: 0.35
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.35
, keith richards
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at you 1.00
be used to for make you feel good 0.84
be try to explain something to me 0.77
be at habidashery 0.76
be used to think 0.76
decide what to do 0.75
be at your eye 0.75
want 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(man, be used to for make you feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dave, be at you)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(star, be at your eye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dave, be at you)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(man, want) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dave, be at you)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(man, be used to for make you feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(man, want)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(star, be at your eye)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(star, be at your eye)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(man, want)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(man, be used to for make you feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gordon, be try to explain something to me)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(man, be used to for make you feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dave, be at you)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(star, be at your eye) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dave, be at you)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(man, want) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dave, be at you)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gordon, be try to explain something to me) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gordon, be try to explain something to me)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dave, be at you)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dave, be at you)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(man, be used to for make you feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(star, be at your eye)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(man, want)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gordon, be try to explain something to me)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(man, be used to for make you feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(star, be at your eye)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(dave, be at you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(man, want)