dc: be under state of emergency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, washington
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, cleveland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under state of emergency 1.00
be under states 0.77
be called state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(las vegas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dc, be under state of emergency)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dc, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be under states)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(dc, be under states)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dc, be under states)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dc, be under states)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dc, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dc, be called state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dc, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dc, be under state of emergency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(las vegas, be called state)