dealer: be in blackjack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.66
, shop
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drug dealer
Weight: 0.36
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in blackjack 1.00
win blackjack 0.96
win in blackjack 0.96
be favored in blackjack 0.94
have advantage in blackjack 0.94
burn cards in casinos 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dealer, win blackjack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dealer, win blackjack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dealer, win blackjack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dealer, win blackjack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)