:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is qld)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dealer, is qld)
Similarity expansion
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dealer, qld)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dealer, qld)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dealer, qld)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dealer, qld)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dealer, is qld)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dealer, is qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is qld)