:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is qld)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dealer, qld)
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dealer, is qld)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dealer, is qld)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dealer, is qld)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dealer, is qld)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dealer, qld)
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dealer, qld)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dealer, qld)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is qld)