death valley: is national park important

Related concepts

Parents	national park Weight: 0.69 , park Weight: 0.68 , area Weight: 0.66 , location Weight: 0.64 , site Weight: 0.62
Siblings	valley Weight: 0.37 , grand canyon Weight: 0.36 , yellowstone national park Weight: 0.35 , central park Weight: 0.35 , rift valley Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is national park important	1.00
is national park	0.98
is park important	0.92
is park	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(park, is national park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(national park, is national park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(national park, is park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(national park, is national park)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(national park, is park)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(national park, is national park)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(national park, is park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is national park)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(park, is national park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park important)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(national park, is national park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park important)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(national park, is park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(grand canyon, is national park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is national park)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(grand canyon, is park) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(death valley, is national park important)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(death valley, is national park)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(death valley, is park)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(death valley, is park)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(death valley, is park)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(death valley, is park important)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(death valley, is park important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(national park, is national park)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(national park, is park)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(park, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(grand canyon, is national park)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(grand canyon, is park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(national park, is national park)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(national park, is park)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(death valley, is national park important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(park, is national park)