debate politics: be used to explore issue

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to explore issue 1.00
requires examine issue 0.91
causes issue would be discuss 0.87
requires study issue 0.84
requires research issue 0.81
requires issue to be debate 0.81
requires fully understand topic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires research issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires research issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)