debate politics: requires research issue

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires research issue 1.00
requires study issue 0.93
requires issue to be debate 0.84
requires examine issue 0.84
be used to explore issue 0.81
causes issue would be discuss 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires research issue)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires study issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires examine issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to explore issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires issue to be debate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires research issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(debate politics, requires research issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires research issue)