debate politics: be used to state view and opinion

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to state view and opinion 1.00
requires opinion 0.91
requires support your opinion 0.86
be used to form your own opinion 0.86
be used to explain different opinion 0.83
be used to see other point of view 0.82
causes understand one political view 0.81
requires oppose viewpoint 0.80
requires strong point of view 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires opinion)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to form your own opinion)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires opinion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to explain different opinion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires opinion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to form your own opinion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to form your own opinion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires opinion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to explain different opinion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to explain different opinion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to form your own opinion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to explain different opinion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)