debate politics: requires strong point of view

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires strong point of view 1.00
be used to see other point of view 0.89
be used to state view and opinion 0.79
causes understand one political view 0.76
requires oppose viewpoint 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to see other point of view)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires oppose viewpoint)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to state view and opinion)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, causes understand one political view)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires strong point of view)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(debate politics, requires strong point of view) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires strong point of view)