debate politics: requires have good knowledge in politics

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires have good knowledge in politics 1.00
requires understand politics 0.92
requires learn about politics 0.92
requires knowledge 0.83
be used to knowledge 0.80
causes understand one political view 0.80
requires knowledge of current event 0.79
requires public speak skill 0.77
requires become politician 0.77
requires get life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires learn about politics)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires understand politics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires understand politics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires understand politics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires learn about politics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires knowledge)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires learn about politics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires knowledge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires understand politics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires learn about politics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires become politician)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires get life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires become politician)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires knowledge)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires knowledge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires get life)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires get life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires become politician)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate politics, causes understand one political view)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires get life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires become politician)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)