debate politics: requires knowledge

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires knowledge 1.00
be used to knowledge 0.96
requires knowledge of current event 0.86
requires have good knowledge in politics 0.83
requires public speak skill 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires knowledge)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, be used to knowledge)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires have good knowledge in politics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(debate politics, requires knowledge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(debate politics, requires knowledge)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(debate politics, requires knowledge)