debt: add to enterprise value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
add to enterprise value 1.00
be added to enterprise value 0.95
be part of enterprise value 0.94
be included in enterprise value 0.92
is value 0.83
be to value 0.83
have value 0.83
increase value 0.82
increase in value 0.82
has value 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stock, increase in value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(stock, have value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(stock, have value)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stock, increase in value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(stock, increase in value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(stock, have value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(equity, is value)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stock, increase in value)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(stock, have value)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(equity, is value)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equity, is value)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be added to enterprise value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, have value)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(stock, increase in value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(equity, is value)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, have value)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(stock, increase in value)