debt: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important in business 0.92
be important to business 0.92
be for businesses good thing 0.89
be good company work for 0.88
be good for company 0.88
be good company work 0.86
be good 0.85
affect business 0.85
be bad for company 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(stock, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work for)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(stock, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work for)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(debt, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(debt, be good for company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(debt, be good for company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt, be for businesses good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stock, be important to business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stock, be important to business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(debt, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)