debt: be bad for company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for company 1.00
be good for company 0.97
be good company work for 0.93
be good company work 0.92
be in company 0.91
be important to company 0.90
be in company used 0.89
has state company 0.87
be good for business 0.84
be beneficial to company 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stock, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(stock, has state company)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stock, has state company)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work for)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stock, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for company)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(debt, be good for company)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for company)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debt, be important to company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debt, be important to company)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for company)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(debt, be good for company)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(debt, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(debt, be important to company)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(debt, be important to company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stock, has state company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(debt, be bad for company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stock, has state company)