stock: be important to company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to company 1.00
has state company 0.88
benefit company 0.85
be important to business 0.84
be important to insurance companies 0.77
is ageing important 0.76
be important for growth 0.75
be important in keynesian system 0.75
be important in system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(investment, be important to insurance companies)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(investment, be important for growth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(investment, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to insurance companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(investment, be important for growth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important in keynesian system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to insurance companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for growth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(capital, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debt, be important to company)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(investment, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(investment, be important to insurance companies)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(investment, be important for growth)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(investment, be important in keynesian system)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(debt, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(debt, be important to company)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(capital, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(capital, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(stock, be important to company)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stock, has state company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(stock, has state company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(stock, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stock, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(stock, has state company)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stock, has state company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be important to company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(investment, be important for growth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(investment, be important to insurance companies)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, be important to business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debt, be important to company)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(investment, be important for growth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(investment, be important to insurance companies)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be important to company)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(investment, be important in keynesian system)