debtor: has quality asset

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
, third party
Weight: 0.52
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.32
, one person
Weight: 0.31
, buyer
Weight: 0.31
, homeless person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality asset 1.00
is current asset 0.92
has quality assets 0.89
be classified as assets 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(buyer, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(buyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(buyer, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(debtor, has quality asset)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debtor, is current asset)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debtor, is current asset)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality assets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(debtor, is current asset)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(debtor, has quality asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(buyer, has quality good)