debtor: need statements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
, third party
Weight: 0.52
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.32
, one person
Weight: 0.31
, buyer
Weight: 0.31
, homeless person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
need statements 1.00
use statements 0.97
need financial statements 0.93
use financial statements 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need statements)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(creditor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(creditor, need statements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(creditor, use statements)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(debtor, need statements)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debtor, use statements)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need financial statements)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(debtor, use statements)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(debtor, use financial statements)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(debtor, use financial statements)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(debtor, need financial statements)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debtor, use statements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(debtor, use financial statements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(debtor, need financial statements)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(debtor, use statements)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(debtor, use financial statements)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(debtor, need financial statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debtor, need statements)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need statements)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use statements)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(debtor, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)