decay: be chemical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chemical 1.00
is chemical 1.00
is chemical change 0.93
be considered chemical change 0.90
be chemical reaction 0.89
is chemical reaction 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tooth decay, be chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(decomposition, be considered chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(decay, be chemical)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(decay, is chemical)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(decay, is chemical change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(decay, is chemical change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(decay, is chemical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(decay, be chemical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical change)