decay: is chemical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is chemical change 1.00
be considered chemical change 0.96
is chemical 0.93
be chemical 0.93
is chemical reaction 0.87
be chemical reaction 0.87
be related to change 0.78
affect oil changes 0.77
be considered change 0.76
has quality change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be considered change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(decomposition, be considered chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tooth decay, be chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(decomposition, be considered change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be considered change)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(decomposition, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(decay, is chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(decay, be chemical)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(decay, is chemical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(decay, be chemical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(decay, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(decay, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(decay, has quality change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(decay, be chemical)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(decay, is chemical)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(decay, has quality change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(decay, be chemical)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be chemical reaction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical reaction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(decomposition, be considered chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decomposition, be considered change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, has quality change)