decay: be in summer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in summer 1.00
be in than winter 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(decay, be in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in than winter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(decay, be in than winter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(decay, be in than winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(decay, be in than winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(decay, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decay, be in summer)